Nad t758 v1 review

delirium Excuse, that interrupt you, but..

Nad t758 v1 review

Enjoyment is a simple concept; you either enjoy something or you don't - it's black and white. And yet the technology charged with aiding in our enjoyment, thus enhancing our lives, has become increasingly complicated. Take for instance home theater: HDMI was heralded as the "one cable solution" yet many of us still wonder when that cable is going to arrive.

nad t758 v1 review

AV preamps and receivers are another area where features and so-called functions have overwhelmed performance and thus our enjoyment, replacing it instead with anxiety. And then there is 3Dwhich I won't even get into. It doesn't take much to begin to understand why home theater and audiophile markets are failing to turn interested consumers into long-term enthusiasts.

Everything has gotten too complicated, for why should anyone invest in multiple speakers, AV receivers, higher-end cables, Blu-ray players and expensive HDTVs when a soundbarfor many, will provide the same level of enjoyment?

I'm not trying to be the voice of doom here, but clearly there is a problem and a disconnect between what the people want and what manufacturers are giving them. Luckily, there are manufacturers like NAD who have always put their customers' enjoyment above all else by keeping things simple.

Disagree with our product rating? Email us and tell us why you think this product should receive a higher rating. Mailing List.

Buying Advice: Marantz SR7012 vs. NAD T758 V3

Open Menu. Page 1 Page 2. NAD is a manufacturer that has been with us awhile and over the years has built a very loyal customer base around the principle of music first. When everything you do falls under a singular focus, in NAD's case a focus on the purest sound reproduction, then the fog of technology becomes easier to see through, for instead of trying to navigate through it you can simply rise above it.

Unlike many of today's modern AV receivers, the T puts music first, which is physically evident in the T 's Spartan appearance.

Iv vein diagram

I'm not sure I've ever seen a more streamlined and minimal AV receiver fascia than the one found on the T There is a small trap door that hides the T 's front mounted inputs composite video, analog audio, digital audio and Audyssey so as not to mar the T 's otherwise tailored good looks.

While the T may have a minimal appearance, it's still a substantial piece; measuring 17 and an eighth inches wide by seven inches tall and 16 inches deep. The T tips the scales at a respectable 34 pounds as well. Around back the T in line with the minimal theme, sports one of the cleanest back panels I've seen in terms of inputs and organization. Starting from the left and working to the right you'll first come across the T 's digital audio and video inputs and outputs. The T 's digital audio and video inputs reside on a card which is part of NAD's MDC platform or Modular Design Construction philosophy whereby owners will be able to upgrade the digital section of the T as the technology evolves without having to purchase a whole new AV receiver.

NAD T 758 v3 A/V Surround Sound Receiver Review

NAD has been employing their MDC philosophy for years and it has served them and their customers well for it makes products like the T practically future-proof. As for the digital inputs themselves, the T has three coaxial and three optical digital inputs mated to both a single optical and coaxial output. With regards to the T 's HDMI prowess it will transcode legacy or analog video signals to the HDMI monitor out, though it will not perform any scaling to p like other similarly priced AV receivers.

NAD does this on purpose, claiming that scaling often occurs either at the source or at the display level, making the feature in an AV receiver such as the T irrelevant and in some instances more complicated than necessary. Continuing on you'll find the T 's analog video inputs which include two composite, an S-Video and three component video inputs mated to a single component video monitor out as well as a single composite monitor output.Within the home theater marketplace, NAD has earned a reputation as a firm whose roots are firmly grounded in the high-end audio tradition, yet as a maker of products that, though they may be premium-priced, are nevertheless affordable.

Yet in almost every way possible NAD offers prospective buyers cues that its core values and priorities are different from those of most mass-market manufacturers. In essence, NAD is about sound quality first and almost everything else second. But when NAD does make strong new technical moves, you can safely bet it will do so in ways calculated to make either a difference in perceived sound quality or to add long-term value to its products.

The MDC approach offers several benefits. Contrast this to the typical mass-market approach where, to be blunt, technology updates more often than not entail replacing old units with new ones—lock, stock, and barrel. While new features may come and go and MDC components can flex and adapt with them as necessarythe core tuner, preamp, and amplifier sections of an NAD receiver remain rock-solid and unchanged over time.

Several examples can be drawn from the T First, it provides—as NAD products have traditionally done—extremely conservatively rated power specifications. In an industry where at least some level of spec inflation is de rigueurNAD takes the opposite tack, honestly rating the T at 2 x Wpc for stereo operation, or 7 x Wpc for 7-channel operation, with both specs taken at very low distortion levels.

Light o rama forums

Does this entail a price premium? It does, though not an outlandish one. Above all, though, look at this AVR for its pure, natural sound quality. This receiver provides just 7.

The T features a simple graphical user interface GUI and setup menu that is highly intuitive and easy to navigate. My finding was that the NAD GUI guides you through Audyssey automated speaker setup in a straightforward way, though with less graphical clarity that is, fewer illustrative onscreen diagrams and the like than I have seen in some other Audyssey implementations.

The Audyssey system significantly simplifies system setup and adds readily apparent sonic benefits. Contrary to common audiophile wisdom which can sometimes entail a bias against DSP-driven EQ systems of any kindI find that Audyssey does not blur or diminish subtle sonic characteristics in good speaker systems; on the contrary, it leaves the core sound of speakers intact, while smoothing and balancing their in-room frequency response.

My basic complaint is that the Dynamic EQ system seems to impart an ever-so-slightly bass-heavy sound. The Audyssey Dynamic Volume function, in turn, can be very useful for those listening in apartments—especially in terms of managing volume levels late at night—but seems to undercut clarity further still.

My suggestion, then, would be to try both functions for yourself and make your own judgment as to whether their benefits outweigh potential drawbacks. First, Stidsen explained that it was a natural choice for NAD to explore digital room correction solutions in general, and to collaborate with Audyssey in particular. Bosovik many years ago.

When that flat responding speaker is placed into a typical room, the bass response is elevated due to 'room gain' and the high frequencies are absorbed by walls and furnishings.

The resulting response in the room is very different from the response in the anechoic chamber, which mimics a 'free space' response.Forums New posts Search forums. E-Books E-Books Quicklinks. Get our latest product reviews and AV stories emailed to you weekly Subscribe. Product Reviews Loudspeakers Quicklinks. Electronics Quicklinks.

AV Accessory Quicklinks.

NAD T 758 V3 is ‘Built to Satisfy’ All Listeners in AV Nirvana Review

Buying Guides Quicklinks. Join us on Facebook Here. What's new New posts Latest activity. Log in Register. Search titles only. Search Advanced search…. New posts. Search forums. Log in. JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. Thread starter Niklasmagnus Start date Mar 12, Niklasmagnus Enthusiast.

For the same money I can get a brand new Tv3. What would you do? Niklasmagnus said:. Still many people are happy with their NADs so please give suggestions between the two.

I will look in to Arcam in parallel. KenM Audioholic Samurai. I love my NAD Tv3. It sounds even better since the implementation of Dirac Live. Inaudible to me, and I have fairly good speakers and ears.Why on earth would a magazine devoted to the latest and greatest in surround sound review a receiver that made its debut in ?

Seven years in receiver years is—well, a lot of years. The V3 also swaps out the previously used Audyssey room correction which was pretty spiffy and convenient to begin with with bleeding-edge-but-nerdy Dirac Live LE, making this one of the few receivers to have it.

To accommodate the new board, the V3 loses one HDMI input, leaving only three in total for the receiver plus one outputas well as two digital audio inputs choose optical or coaxial for either. Having just three HDMI inputs is a notable limitation to be aware of, but probably not a deal breaker for most systems.

Tsmc 28nm wiki

However, your streaming hub might be integrated today within your game console, or in your TV or Blu-ray player.

In keeping with the times, legacy composite video inputs are absent altogether, having been eliminated in the V2. While that eliminates your local radio stations, you get them back again in streaming form along with stations from all over the world. Should we still call this a receiver? Now part of the Lenbrook Group, which also markets PSB speakers and Bluesound streaming audio products, it has a healthy line of two-channel and surround products.

Among the surround products, the only other model to get a V3 upgrade so far is the brawnier T receiver; both the T and T have seven amp channels. They are almost puritanically small, but the NAD ethos is to put the good stuff under the hood, where you can manipulate it via remote control or the new control app.

The remote is sensible looking, with controls well differentiated by size, shape, color, and layout.

nad t758 v1 review

A second, smaller remote is supplied for Zone 2 operation. Rated power is watts times two and 60 watts times seven, NAD being among the few manufacturers to provide an all-channels-driven spec. As always, you can check that against our Test Bench specs. Those seven amp channels are enough to run a 5. You can add rear height channels to achieve 5. DTS:X was absent at press time but planned in a future software update.

Out of the latter hangs an included USB hub with four ports. Ultra HD passthrough runs at a maximum of 60 frames per second with color sampling in other words, no color compression and with HDR10 picture-optimizing metadata but not Dolby Vision—so far.

HDCP 2. Doing Dirac But the biggest story here is the addition of Dirac, from the year-old Swedish company that offers room correction for high-end home theater systems as well as audio processing for mobile and automotive use. This bass range is where most rooms have the largest impact on performance. There is a camp that advocates for doing both. Most receivers have a combined auto setup and room correction program.

Dirac works differently, leaving speaker settings to be manually input by the user and performing only room correction. Note that this receiver requires you to specify your speaker characteristics in the Speaker Configuration menu and then assign amp channels to either height or back-surround duties in a separate Amplifier menu.

That's somewhat unusual and not well flagged in the manual.Gallery New media New comments Search media. Log in Register. Search titles only. Search Advanced search…. Log in. JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.

Buying Advice: Marantz SR vs. NAD T V3.

nad t758 v1 review

Thread starter Jazzy Jeff Start date Dec 11, Jazzy Jeff New Member. Thread Starter. Hello - First time posting, anything - anywhere! I am currently running a Rotel RSX into a 5. I am a music first person, and that is the most important thing I want to continue with my new AVR, that Music will sound as good as it can with my current speakers and a new AVR.

I don't really plan to add more speakers to my system, although maybe someday down the road I would think about adding 2 Atmos height speakers.

Reading all the reviews I have about these two AVR's makes it very tough to choose between them. On the other hand, the Marantz also does an excellent job with Music and Movies, and it feels like the Marantz has so many nice bells and whistles, but do I really need them?

And then of course is the whole Audyssey vs. Dirac conversation. I am not a "tweeker" per se, so I will work on getting the best possible settings, and then probably live with it that way for a long time. Any advice, insight and opinions you can give me are greatly appreciated.

Hey Jazzy Jeff! Killer TV! Definitely ranks up there as one of the best TVs ever made. A headhead pick between these two AVRs.Gallery New media New comments Search media. Log in Register. Search titles only. Search Advanced search…. Log in. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. AudiocRaver Start date Oct 1, Last edited by a moderator: Jun 26, Spectacular review, Wayne.

Great read Sounds like a great piece of gear! Been enjoying this receiver for a short while now. Dirac built in really simplified things. BluOS has been flawless and sounds great. Interesting to read it handled your electrostats well. Pretty good for an avr at this price point. AudiocRaver Senior Admin Staff member. Thread Starter. Hey, John, I was a little surprised myself. I kept pushing it expecting to find a limitation somewhere but it just kept on shining!

I agree, great review. Good in depth details here. I love NAD receivers. Thanks all. I believe this review has made an NAD fan out of me. I like their philosophy and approach, and love the result! I have the NAD T and love it. Thanks Wayne for the great review and read.

Ultima 6 speed fxr

This will be my next receiver, and I should have it in hand within the month. Excited to try it and to try Dirac. Peter Loeser Moderator Staff member. Excellent review Wayne. Bookmarked for a 2nd read. Been a NAD for a while but it's been years since I've owned one. I would also like to integrate Dirac into the new HT.

Great info and detail here. Joined Jul 4, Messages Yes, detailed and knowledgeable review as usualThey are my go-to budget integrated for a few reasons; power, finesse, and simplicity. With the addition of a new phono stage, I foresee NAD further gilding its place in the audiophile annals as the most practical recommendation for those looking to make that first audiophile step in the right direction. The idea of the BEE V2 stays the same as its predecessor.

The new phono stage is of great convenience for those who are just getting into vinyl. Be it with either new or inherited turntables that do not supply their own pre-amplification. The BEE V2 and its predecessors have been serious players in the arena of value-conscious audiophiles for some time.

It builds no walls around itself by including compromised digital source decoding inputs, and instead focuses specifically on supplying the most refined and capable sound one can find for the money.

So much so, that it competes with many compromised designs well above its own price class. We should start at the back first with the power cord. It is not the removable or upgradable type. It is of the two conductor 18 gauge variant.

As grounding through any power cord alone is not achieved, this unit requires a grounded AC receptacle or separate earth ground.

10 Best Receivers 2018

Coincidentally enough this exact information is located on the backside of the chassis but on opposite ends of the device, adjacent to the phono stage. It is of note that the BEE V2 draws less than 1 watt of power while in standby mode. I can see why NAD is proud to display this green attribute with a small screen printed logo next to the power mains switch.

NAD T 775 A/V Receiver (TPV 88)

Scanning further along the back of the BEE V2 you find the usual warning and hazard labels, along with a specific designation of design and manufacturing locations. That information means less and less as time goes by.

So my advice is to take note of the information if it pleases you, but make no decisions about quality based on it and move on.

At near center of the back panel, you will find a single set of right and left, positive in red, negative in black five-way binding posts. The cost and space savings incurred by not including an additional set of speaker outputs is obvious, but the philosophical statement it makes is that a we as consumers are seldom running a more than a single set of speakers from one amplifier, and b that consumers do not typically understand the minimum speaker impedance requirements of the amplifier in question.

Meaning, the input jacks and source input selector buttons are in perfect however offset alignment.

nad t758 v1 review

Firstly and most likely to go unnoticed are the changes in the venting. Still confined to four distinct rows running front to back, here in the V2 they are subdivided into eight rounded segments which add a little drama when compared to the previously simple and boring vents of yore.

Gone are the two dimples that flanked either side of the rigid steel chassis cover. They are replaced by a total of eight recessed hex-head screws that doubly fasten the sides and now secure the top in four equidistant spots behind the front fascia. In theory, this tightening up of the chassis could help eliminate micro-vibrations from affecting the performance of the amplifier during listening.

What has changed at either ends is the rounded edges that sweep a smooth radius around to the sides of the new BEE V2, overall achieving a more refined and upscale look.

Exposed as that may be, the updated NAD now has more than one good side to look at. The controls moreover stay the same. Bass, Treble, and Balance knobs with a Tone Defeat button nestled in between. The volume knob is new and different but no easier to grip. Control in the palm of your hand however is where the BEE V2 could win me over for practicality.

Carista hack apk

Each input of the unit gets its own gray button with the name screen-printed atop the rubber button itself. Over time, however, I predict that these labels may wear away leaving mystery to the unfamiliar as to what function they correspond to. Yes, the input selections could be managed with a simple toggle like the volume control, but I appreciate anything that saves time and offers a more visibly direct control. Power On and Power Off both receiver their own color-coded buttons.


thoughts on “Nad t758 v1 review

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top